What is the Chevron deference and why has it been overruled? (2024)

What is the Chevron deference and why has it been overruled? (1)Image source, Getty Images

Anthony Zurcher, Nada Tawfik, Lisa Lambert & Kayla Epstein

BBC News

  • Published

The Supreme Court in a 6-3 vote killed a legal precedent that conservatives have attacked for decades, known as the "Chevron deference".

"Today, the court places a tombstone on Chevron no one can miss," Justice Neil Gorsuch, one of the most conservative members wrote.

The deference, set in 1984 in a case involving the oil giant, gave federal agencies wide powers to interpret laws and decide the best ways to apply them.

In ending the deference, the conservative-majority court has slashed and severely weakened the powers of agencies including the Environmental Protection Agency.

The aftershocks of such a seismic decision will be felt throughout the federal government. Let's take a look at how we got here.

What was the Supreme Court case about?

While “Chevron deference” may sound like a chess strategy, it actually refers to a landmark Supreme Court ruling, Chevron v Natural Resources Defense Council.

The court decided in 1984 that judges should defer to federal agencies in interpreting ambiguous parts of statutes.

The idea was that if Congress passes a law where something is unclear - or there is a “gap” - it is up to an agency to fill in the gap.

In practice, that gave arms of the federal government such as the Environmental Protection Agency the freedom to create and implement rules without fear of protracted legal battles.

Then, in 2020, herring fishermen entered the chat.

That year the Trump administration began requiring that they cover the costs of taking federal monitors on fishing trips. The fishing vessels did not have a choice - it was illegal to fish without federal monitors on board to check on the Atlantic fishery, an area that extends from Maine to North Carolina.

They previously didn't pay for the monitors.

Commercial fishing companies - supported by conservative and corporate groups including the billionaire Charles Koch - sued in two separate cases.

In one, a federal judge ruled the National Marine Fisheries Service could legally impose the costs under the Chevron deference.

Who wins in throwing it out?

This is a big win for conservatives.

For four decades, they have been working to overturn the precedent.

By giving executive agencies more freedom to implement laws, in the conservative view, it vastly expanded the power of the federal bureaucracy.

In areas like workplace safety, financial markets and the environment, courts – and, by extension, businesses contemplating legal challenges to regulations - had to yield to agencies' interpretations of laws.

The Supreme Court has been paring back agency power in recent years, saying there are “major questions” of policy that Congress must explicitly detail in order for agencies to take action on them.

“Chevron deference” as a legal principle, however, had endured, setting guidelines for lower courts to follow.

On Friday, the Supreme Court delivered the final blow.

Image source, Getty Images

Who loses?

This is a defeat for the Biden administration, which argued that throwing out the Chevron deference would be destabilising.

Liberal Justice Elena Kagan said that the ruling elevates the Supreme Court’s power over other branches of US government. The president, Congress and court are supposed to have equal power under the US Constitution, so by her reading the ruling is a loss for the White House, the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Advocacy groups and progressives also saw it as a setback for clean water, public health, fair lending, worker safety, and other areas where people rely on federal help.

The Asbestos Disease Awareness Organisation, for example, called the ruling "a monumental setback that will harm all Americans and profoundly impact our nation's environmental safeguards and public health protections".

"The court has set us on a path towards policy paralysis," it said.

Where do we go from here?

The ruling does not apply to past agency regulations and actions.

Looking to the future, corporations and others wanting to challenge agency rules will be heading to court and we can expect to see judges around the country now weighing in on what the federal government - and its bureaucracy - does.

Rules, requirements and penalties could all be stopped before they are implemented or overturned.

In the long-term, expect Congress to try to write more explicit instructions in its laws that lay out exactly how agencies will implement them. That could lead to confusion in large agencies carrying out different programmes - if Congress can actually pass those laws.

“The problem is many people think the Congress is quite dysfunctional now,” Philip Bobbitt, an expert on constitutional law at Columbia Law School, told the BBC.

“Where the court is going… seems to defy the realities of gridlock in the Congress as it's actually operating today."

Related Topics

  • US Supreme Court
  • US government
  • US politics
  • US Congress
  • United States
What is the Chevron deference and why has it been overruled? (2024)
Top Articles
Innocams Young
Maxytheestalli
Scheelzien, volwassenen - Alrijne Ziekenhuis
Voorraad - Foodtrailers
Math Playground Protractor
How to Type German letters ä, ö, ü and the ß on your Keyboard
Katie Boyle Dancer Biography
Weekly Math Review Q4 3
Walmart End Table Lamps
Condogames Xyz Discord
Nashville Predators Wiki
Gdp E124
Pizza Hut In Dinuba
How Much Is Tay Ks Bail
CANNABIS ONLINE DISPENSARY Promo Code — $100 Off 2024
Hennens Chattanooga Dress Code
I Saysopensesame
Epguides Strange New Worlds
Program Logistics and Property Manager - Baghdad, Iraq
Samantha Aufderheide
Diakimeko Leaks
The BEST Soft and Chewy Sugar Cookie Recipe
Homeaccess.stopandshop
Stoney's Pizza & Gaming Parlor Danville Menu
Amerisourcebergen Thoughtspot 2023
2015 Kia Soul Serpentine Belt Diagram
Guinness World Record For Longest Imessage
Lesson 1.1 Practice B Geometry Answers
Insidious 5 Showtimes Near Cinemark Southland Center And Xd
Stubhub Elton John Dodger Stadium
Aid Office On 59Th Ashland
Autotrader Bmw X5
Here’s how you can get a foot detox at home!
Shnvme Com
Cal Poly 2027 College Confidential
Saybyebugs At Walmart
Invalleerkracht [Gratis] voorbeelden van sollicitatiebrieven & expert tips
craigslist: modesto jobs, apartments, for sale, services, community, and events
Armageddon Time Showtimes Near Cmx Daytona 12
Go Bananas Wareham Ma
התחבר/י או הירשם/הירשמי כדי לראות.
Wal-Mart 140 Supercenter Products
All Characters in Omega Strikers
Professors Helpers Abbreviation
Windy Bee Favor
Germany’s intensely private and immensely wealthy Reimann family
De boeken van Val McDermid op volgorde
Bradshaw And Range Obituaries
Craigslist Free Cats Near Me
Definition of WMT
Arnold Swansinger Family
Skybird_06
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Lidia Grady

Last Updated:

Views: 6169

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (65 voted)

Reviews: 88% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Lidia Grady

Birthday: 1992-01-22

Address: Suite 493 356 Dale Fall, New Wanda, RI 52485

Phone: +29914464387516

Job: Customer Engineer

Hobby: Cryptography, Writing, Dowsing, Stand-up comedy, Calligraphy, Web surfing, Ghost hunting

Introduction: My name is Lidia Grady, I am a thankful, fine, glamorous, lucky, lively, pleasant, shiny person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.